Cyberguide Ratings
I thought the evaluation sheet provided was quite clear and
could be easily filled in. Areas of authority and reliability were well
addressed as was currency. This evaluation sheet focused on the content of the
site rather than the technical aspects. Criteria
that were not included which might add or subtract from a websites rating could
be:
-easy of assess
-the website is advertisement supported
-login requirements
-aesthetics and design
-supported format (e.g. flash)
-support from site
Evaluating an ‘evaluating website’ website
Looking through the CARS Checklist website I found that it
was failing in many of the checklist areas Schrock had mentioned. The authors
name was there, but not his credentials or contact details. Many of the links
were broken or did not lead to where they were meant to. Further the website
was last updated was in 2003 which in internet terms is very out-dated.
No comments:
Post a Comment